[db-wg] Proposal to limit the use of the RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT on mnt-by
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to limit the use of the RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT on mnt-by
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to limit the use of the RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT on mnt-by
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Thu Oct 22 13:11:12 CEST 2015
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:55:07PM +0200, Job Snijders wrote: Dear Job, WG Members > [ exec summary: I'd like to see a round of +1's if you agree with the > proposal and my small addition at the end. ] [cut] > When the two steps above have been completed, it seems to me that the > RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT maintainer can be deleted all together from the > database, and we rely on the business rule as implemented in #1. > > I am happy to hear none of the two steps are "technically difficult". > > +1 from me +1 Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to limit the use of the RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT on mnt-by
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal to limit the use of the RIPE-NCC-RPSL-MNT on mnt-by
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]