[db-wg] [routing-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [routing-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [routing-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Sat Nov 7 02:29:45 CET 2015
> I believe most prefixes are registered in NTTCOM so you too voted with yout feet >> unfortunately, the answer for many operators is NO. they voted with >> their feet. you can say what they SHOULD do. my family has a lot of >> jokes about how the world should be. > I don't know why you say this. i suggest you measure the number of prefix allocations in the arin region which are in the arin irr. > Does "many operators expressed opinion with their feet" mean that thus > "many other operators" should not produce or consume IRR data? no. i meant they did not choose to register in the irr of the rir from which they got the space. ripe region is unusual in a very positive way. do not induce to other regions. > Please approach me off-list should you have any further NTT specific > questions. i have better sources :) > Randy, your assertation that RIR's IRR are not relevant has been > noted. but that was not my assertion. my point is that, in other regions, a large portion of the space allocated by the rir is not registered in the irr provided by the rir. the ripe region is an outlier. and in a good way. we should not induce to other regions without measurement and can not tell operators there how to run or register their networks. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [routing-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [routing-wg] Solving the issue of rogue ROUTE objects in the RIPE Database
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]