[db-wg] abuse-c on legacy resources
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c on legacy resources
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c on legacy resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
denis
ripedenis at yahoo.co.uk
Fri May 29 15:06:05 CEST 2015
Hi Nick On 29/05/2015 14:47, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 29/05/2015 13:33, denis wrote: >> I am not against policy change if that is the only way forward. But let me >> just throw a quick question back at you. If someone manages (legacy) >> resources and have customers using some of these resources and all this is >> documented in the RIPE Database and one of those customers 'could' cause >> abuse, does it not make sense to advertise an abuse contact? Isn't this >> just good management of resources? > in theory, advertising this is a good thing and won't do any harm. In > practice people will continue to use their old templates as before and > won't bother changing things unless there's some impetus to do so. > > The LRH community is receptive to the idea of good stewardship of > resources, so I don't see why they wouldn't be interested in mentioning > legacy resources in the "Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE Database" > document. So are you suggesting that ripe-563 policy is amended to include legacy resources? cheers denis > > Nick > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20150529/8f1616d9/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c on legacy resources
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c on legacy resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]