[db-wg] History lost ...

Piotr Strzyzewski wrote:

> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 05:42:59PM +0200, Daniel Suchy wrote:
[...]
> From my point of view, there was no formal proposal to discuss. Just an
> informal question by Eric. It is even unclear which objects are expected
> to be visible.

IIRC there were a couple of quite informal discussions about this Q,
some of them maybe even in the hallways :-)

The general line of reasonsing seesm to be:

The Data Protection environment states that an organisation is not
supposed to collect data, or to keep storing it (and even less so,
making it publicly accessible!) unless there is a need to do so for
the declared reason, operation or goal.

As the obejcts have been deleted, it can be inferred that there is no
longer a valid reason to store those items or to make them accessible.

> Piotr

Nevertheless, I suppose the NCC would still be able to work with e.g.
LAEs to disclose the transaction that removed an item from the DB ;-)

FWIW, HTH,
Wilfried