[db-wg] Proposal regarding Orphaned Objects
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal regarding Orphaned Objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal regarding Orphaned Objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Thu May 7 13:32:20 CEST 2015
On Thu, 07 May 2015 00:01:21 +0100, Shane Kerr wrote: > > However, we know that some people who maintain the parent objects are > unable to correct the database. This is a problem both for those > maintainers and for anyone hoping for accurate information about the > network. > > We know there is a theoretical problem where someone might have network > information deleted from the RIPE database that they want to keep there. > We do not now if this is an actual problem. > > I remind the working group that if someone *does* have their network > deleted inappropriately, then the record can be re-created. Updating a > RIPE Database entry does not instantly de-peer people or the like. > > I'm quite happy with a dispute policy that works to always restore a > more-specific inetnum object in case of complaint by the former > maintainer of the object, and then lets any further resolution occur > using other means. That all makes sense to me. Thnaks, Shane. Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal regarding Orphaned Objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal regarding Orphaned Objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]