[db-wg] Proposal regarding Orphaned Objects
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal regarding Orphaned Objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal regarding Orphaned Objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at instituut.net
Fri May 1 15:47:12 CEST 2015
Dear Denis, On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:44:46PM +0000, denis walker wrote: > The reclaim functionality does cover the related routing and reverse > delegation objects. That is what it was introduced for. The point you > are missing is that it ONLY applies to resource objects where the RIPE > NCC has a contractual relationship with the resource holder (or their > sponsoring organisation) for that resource. If you want this > functionality for legacy address space I suspect you need to consider > the address policy issues before looking at database technical issues. I learned something new today! Thank you. Is someone aware of a document that describes why the reclaim functionality was not made available to any and all inetnum holders? Is there some kind of technical limitation? Kind regards, Job
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal regarding Orphaned Objects
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal regarding Orphaned Objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]