[db-wg] re-evaluate route-object authorisation model
Job Snijders job at ntt.net
Sat Jun 27 14:41:32 CEST 2015
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 02:35:20PM +0200, George Michaelson wrote: > On 27 June 2015 at 09:17, Job Snijders <job at ntt.net> wrote: > > > Why then, do you expect anyone to trust RIPE IRR for all the un-RIPE > > > managed space which can be freely added, to permit RIPE managed space > > > related objects to be made? > > > > I don't recall expecting that? Did i in some earlier email forget to > > insert a criticial 'not' in a sentence or something? > > So those route objects which refer to RIPE managed space, and non-RIPE > managed space. Do you filter them out? The ones which have non-RIPE > objects inserted? > > I thought you meant that if it was in the RIPE IRR you trusted it. I > didn't realize you were performing a post-check on the origination of > the referred elements in route and other objects. Maybe some forward looking statements caused confusion, there may be a discrepancy between what we have today in the database, what I have today deployed in the network, what I wish we had and where we are heading :-) I suggest we focus again on the topic at hand.
[ db-wg Archives ]