[db-wg] re-evaluate route-object authorisation model
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] re-evaluate route-object authorisation model
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] re-evaluate route-object authorisation model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at ntt.net
Sat Jun 27 00:04:50 CEST 2015
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 05:54:08AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > >> o there are operators at euro ixen which require peers' routes be > >> registered in ripe irr. we don't have to like it, it's just > >> business; get over it. > > > > from the point of view of ixp operations, insisting in ripe-irr is > > neither necessary nor a good idea. > > i gave up trying to explain that to peers a long time ago. I wouldn't mind reaching out to those 'euro ixen' you mentioned. Can you either onlist or offlist tell me? > and note that, with one mouth, job has said that the ripe irr is the > only one he will trust. Unsure if i follow you exactly, but indeed, I only trust the RIPE IRR when it comes to RIPE managed space. Kind regards, Job
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] re-evaluate route-object authorisation model
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] re-evaluate route-object authorisation model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]