[db-wg] Temporary origins

* Alex Band <alexb at ripe.net> [2015-07-02 11:45]:
> Thanks for sharing your experiences George. 
> 
> I'm curious to hear from our Community about what they think about
> this mode of operation; simply create the route object on the
> inetnum holder's authorisation alone, inform the ASN holder that it
> was created and only remove the object if they object. 
> 
> It would simplify the authorisation model tremendously and save a
> lot of frustration and customer support tickets. 

Hello Alex,

I would support that. Could there be a mechanism to block "repeat
offenders" from creating route: objects with my AS?

I'm just envisioning an "edit war" of people adding a route object and
me requesting it to be removed.

Or am I just too paranoid/pesimistic?

Regards

Sebastian

-- 
GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A  9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE)
'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE.
            -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 581 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20150709/6f9aa654/attachment.sig>