[db-wg] Help needed to delete an object via email
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Help needed to delete an object via email
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal about personalised authorisation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Fri Aug 7 16:32:43 CEST 2015
At 16:15 07/08/2015 +0200, denis wrote: Thanks! Good workaround. -Hank >HI Hank > >Just a note for the future. If you find yourself in this situation again >you can try doing an update on the object first to remove the problematic >"remarks:" attribute and then delete the object in a second step. This >work around often helps in these situations. It gets around the problems >of weird behaviour of mail clients. > >cheers >denis > >On 07/08/2015 11:01, Hank Nussbacher wrote: >>At 10:32 07/08/2015 +0200, Edward Shryane wrote: >> >>Was finally able to delete it from a 3rd mail client - Outlook (Office >>365 in the cloud). >> >>Feel free to try from Gmail to recreate the bug. >> >>-Hank >> >>>Good morning Hank, >>> >>>it appears that your mail client is wrapping the remarks line when it >>>reaches the URL. This produces an invalid RPSL object, and doesn't >>>match the version in the database. >>> >>>Can you check your mail client settings? >>> >>>A workaround is to use another update mechanism (Syncupdates, >>>webupdates or the REST API). >>> >>>Regards >>> >>>Ed Shryane >>>RIPE NCC >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > On 7 Aug 2015, at 10:16, Hank Nussbacher <hank at efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote: >>> > >>> > At 10:05 07/08/2015 +0200, Piotr Strzyzewski wrote: >>> >> On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:56:17AM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote: >>> >> >> Are you absolutely sure that this is not due to some other reasons? >>> >> >> I have "reproduced" your object under my ip space just a minute >>>ago and >>> >> >> was able to delete it without any problems via email interface. >>>The only >>> >> >> important difference is that it doesn't have LEGACY status. I have >>> >> >> created it one more time - take a look at 83.230.58.0/24. Just >>>let me >>> >> >> know if you see any meaningful differences to 192.114.48.0/20. >>> >> > >>> >> > Indeed your object looks correct and has the proper remarks >>>line. Someone >>> >> > else encountered the same issue with a legacy object so the bug >>>might be >>> >> > specific to LEGACY objects only. >>> >> >>> >> I have created similar object under LEGACY space. Take a look at the >>> >> 157.158.200.0/24. I was also able to delete it with email interface. >>> >> Will keep them both for one day. >>> > >>> > Try deleting the 192.114.48.0/20 object (in correct pw). I get: >>> > >>> > Delete FAILED: [inetnum] 192.114.48.0 - 192.114.63.255 >>> > >>> > inetnum: 192.114.48.0 - 192.114.63.255 >>> > netname: ISRAEL-SMALL-BLOCK10 >>> > descr: Israel Inter-University Computation Center >>> > country: IL >>> > admin-c: HN293-RIPE >>> > tech-c: HN293-RIPE >>> > org: ORG-IIIC1-RIPE >>> > status: LEGACY >>> > remarks: For information on "status:" attribute read >>> > https: >>>//www.ripe.net/data-tools/db/faq/faq-status-values-legacy-resources >>> > mnt-by: AS378-MNT >>> > mnt-lower: AS378-MNT >>> > changed: hank at mail.iucc.ac.il 20050515 >>> > created: 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z >>> > last-modified: 2014-05-27T13:18:49Z >>> > source: RIPE >>> > >>> > ***Error: Authorisation for [inetnum] 192.114.48.0 - >>>192.114.63.255 failed >>> > using "mnt-by:" >>> > not authenticated by: AS378-MNT >>> > >>> > ***Error: Authorisation for [inetnum] 192.0.0.0 - 192.255.255.255 >>>failed >>> > using "mnt-lower:" >>> > not authenticated by: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT >>> > >>> > ***Error: Authorisation for [inetnum] 192.0.0.0 - 192.255.255.255 >>>failed >>> > using "mnt-by:" >>> > not authenticated by: RIPE-NCC-HM-MNT >>> > >>> > ***Error: Object [inetnum] 192.114.48.0 - 192.114.63.255 doesn't >>>match version >>> > in database >>> > >>> > See last error. >>> > >>> > I also get: >>> > >>> > DELETE REQUESTED FOR: >>> > >>> > inetnum: 192.114.48.0 - 192.114.63.255 >>> > netname: ISRAEL-SMALL-BLOCK10 >>> > descr: Israel Inter-University Computation Center >>> > country: IL >>> > admin-c: HN293-RIPE >>> > tech-c: HN293-RIPE >>> > org: ORG-IIIC1-RIPE >>> > status: LEGACY >>> > remarks: For information on "status:" attribute read >>>https://www.ripe.net/data-tools/db/faq/faq-status-values-legacy-resources >>> > mnt-by: AS378-MNT >>> > mnt-lower: AS378-MNT >>> > changed: hank at mail.iucc.ac.il 20050515 >>> > created: 1970-01-01T00:00:00Z >>> > last-modified: 2014-05-27T13:18:49Z >>> > source: RIPE >>> > >>> > --- >>> > OBJECT MODIFICATION REQUESTED: >>> > >>> > @@ -8,3 +8,4 @@ >>> > status: LEGACY >>> > -remarks: For information on "status:" attribute read >>>https://www.ripe.net/data-tools/db/faq/faq-status-values-legacy-resources >>> > +remarks: For information on "status:" attribute read >>> > +https: >>>//www.ripe.net/data-tools/db/faq/faq-status-values-legacy-resources >>> > mnt-by: AS378-MNT >>> > >>> > -Hank >>> > >>> > >>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Help needed to delete an object via email
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal about personalised authorisation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]