[db-wg] Replacing "changed" with "last-modified" implementation plan

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 02:42:10PM +0200, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote:

Hi Tim

> On 12 Sep 2014, at 11:36, Piotr Strzyzewski <Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 05:20:07PM +0200, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote:
> >> Following the consensus call we looked into the proposal to replace ?changed? with ?created? and ?last-modified?.
> > 
> > [cut]
> > 
> > I like this plan/proposal/schedule. It is extremely careful, which is
> > good in this situation.
> > One question: are you going to introduce --list-versions and
> > --show-version for those object which doesn't support them now. This
> > could lead to some problems (data protection, data retention).
> > However this could be also more consistent with the removal of the changed
> > lines. Would you elaborate on that?
> 
> In this case the actual changes should not be public, for the reasons
> you mention.
> 
> However, we can look into providing more detailed history to
> authorised maintainers of such objects. Would this add value for you?
> The idea would be that as an ?owner? you have full insight into the
> history, and you can use remarks for anything you would wish to share
> with the public.

I can live with the remarks lines. :)

Piotr

-- 
gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski
E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl