[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] Options for extending "abuse-c:"
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Options for extending "abuse-c:"
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Options for extending "abuse-c:"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Thu May 8 12:16:14 CEST 2014
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:03:02PM +0200, Denis Walker wrote: Dear Denis > Looking at your reply and others I think either I am misunderstanding the > problem, or everyone is misunderstanding my proposed solutions. > > I understood the subnet issue to mean an organisation has more than one > default abuse handling team within their organisation. For example they may > have three allocations and have a different abuse team for each allocation. > I did not expect an organisation to have hundreds of abuse teams, so I > don't think this solution would create too much of a problem. The > ORGANISATION object is not going to grow too large. I get it. I have mixed up both issues into one. Please excuse me, there is students party next to my office window ;-) Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Options for extending "abuse-c:"
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Options for extending "abuse-c:"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]