[db-wg] last-modified:, a succesor to changed:
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] last-modified:, a succesor to changed:
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] last-modified:, a succesor to changed:
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Thu Apr 17 15:06:17 CEST 2014
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 01:58:39PM +0200, Denis Walker wrote: Dear All > If we implement attributes with generated values is there any point in > keeping the "changed:" attribute at all? > > It: > -is user set to a vast range of dates (user's choice) with as many or few > instances as you wish > -is unreliable and possibly miss-leading to anyone else > -will become, even if correct, a duplication of both the generated values > and --list-versions output > -requires mandatory email address > -invites abuse > > Maybe it could be deprecated if the proposed attributes are implemented? Although I see some idea behind keeping the "changed:" attribute (at least as optional one), I fully support making it deprecated if the proposal of implementing last-modified: would be accepted. Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] last-modified:, a succesor to changed:
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] last-modified:, a succesor to changed:
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]