[db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c + org

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c + org
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c + org

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Peter Koch pk at DENIC.DE
Wed Jul 3 08:48:25 CEST 2013

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:40:18PM +0200, Gilles Massen wrote:

> I wouldn't want to challenge the policy process based on my inattention,
> but considering that the policy text explicitely mentions inetnum and
> aut-num, I never understood the proposed implementation as the only way,
> only as a facilitating workaround to inetnum-referenced abuse-c. But
> that's probably only me...

no

-Peter

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c + org
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] [anti-abuse-wg] abuse-c + org

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]