[db-wg] status and use/fulness of the geoloc: attribute - language attribute
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] status and use/fulness of the geoloc: attribute
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] status and use/fulness of the geoloc: attribute - language attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wilfried Woeber
Woeber at CC.UniVie.ac.at
Wed Sep 19 20:09:45 CEST 2012
Wilfried Woeber wrote: > Dear DB-Folks, [...] > What was your experience? When preparing for this thread, I had a look at the specification for the language: tag. The syntax prescribes "Valid two-letter ISO 639-1 language code" However, this appears to be a sparsely populated list when compared to the three-letter list. What is the difference or what is the motivation for the restriction to the short code. As an aside (I am ignorant with that regard), I have seen language encodings being widely used that look like PT_PT or PT_BR. Difference or applicability? Wilfried.
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] status and use/fulness of the geoloc: attribute
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] status and use/fulness of the geoloc: attribute - language attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]