[db-wg] whois-server friendly client programming
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] whois-server friendly client programming
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] whois-server friendly client programming
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joao Damas
Joao_Damas at isc.org
Fri Mar 2 03:03:20 CET 2007
On 2 Mar 2007, at 03:31, Henning Brauer wrote: > > right now, I have whois.ripe.net hardwired, of course this is going > to change before the tool is released. > I am using > "-r -a -T <objtype> <object>" > for aut-num and as-set, and > "-r -a -T <objtype> -i origin <as>" > for route objects. you can reduce the information you get back by asking the RIPE whois server to give you only the primary keys using the -K flag. In route objects that would give you the prefix and the origin only, and not the rest of the ancillary info. The option was put there just for this use. > > Questions: > can I make life easier for the whois servers by using another set of > query options? > > what is a good default whois server? whois.ripe.net? whois.radb.net? they tend to mirror each other and be sync'ed. By using the -a option above, you are specifying that the server search them all, so it doesn't matter. > > of course, I run into the penalty delays the whois server imposes > because of the amount of queries I send. How do I deal with that? you contact the RIPE NCC and sign an AUP, so the limit is removed. > do nothing, just accept the delay (that's how it is now)? > > is it possible (and feasable!) to mirror the entire IRR? is this > documented somewhere? I'd happily point to that documentation and > recommend running a local mirror in the manpage if that is feasable. Again, yes, possible. Ask the people who run the IRRs (each of the ones you want to mirror) Joao
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] whois-server friendly client programming
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] whois-server friendly client programming
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]