[db-wg] IM contact

Hi,

> So why not go completely abstract and support an URI field, like
> 
>   URI: <role> <URI> [optional]
> 
> Where <role> is a set of peviously defined words. This would 
> also allow easy extension later.
> 
> e.g.
> 
>   URI: abuse im:icq:1234567890
>   URI: sales sip:sales at isp.net
>   URI: info http://www.myisp.net/info/

That would indeed make putting contact info in the db very flexible. I don't
think we should put the role in the URI field, because there already is a
role object in the db, and two ways to specify a role will probably cause a
bit of a mess. I think adding the URI field to the irt, role and person
objects would be enough to structure the information.

Otherwise I think this a good idea to consider.
- Sander