[db-wg] Re: [ncc-services-wg] Re: [enum-wg] Proposal for new org-type

thanks for this alert, Niall!

Niall O'Reilly wrote:

> 
> On 4 Oct 2006, at 16:07, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
> 
>> During his presentation in the ENUM WG, Antoin Verschuren made the
>> following proposal.
>>
>>> In order for ENUM registries to not be misinterpreted in the RIPE
>>> NCC database, I want to propose to change an organization type to be
>>> used in the organization object.
>>> Current organization types are:
>>>
>>>  IANA
>>>
>>>  RIR
>>>
>>>  NIR
>>>
>>>  LIR
>>>
>>>  NON-REGISTRY
>>> I would like this NON-REGISTRY to be changed to OTHER.
>>
>>
>> I will declare consensus in the ENUM WG unless objections to Antoin's
>> proposal are posted on the ENUM WG mailing list before 12:00 UTC on
>> Thursday, 18 October 2006.
> 
> 
> That was a typo.  I'm sorry for the confusion.
> I should of course have put "12:00 UTC on Thursday, 19 October 2006".
> 
> As this time has now arrived, and no positive objections to Antoin's
> proposal have been posted on the ENUM WG mailing list, I therefore now
> declare consensus in in the ENUM WG in favour of this proposal.
> 
> On behalf of the ENUM WG, I request the RIPE-NCC to implement Antoin's
> proposal.
> 
> I ask the Database and NCC-Services WGs to note this consensus and
> request the Chairs of these WGs to advise the RIPE-NCC whether there is
> any reason not to proceed with implementation of this proposal.

I have not heard additional input since the DB-WG meeting on Friday morning,
so in accordancve with action [DB-AP53.5 WW144] (1) I herewith ask the
RIPE NCC to proceed with implementation.

> Best regards,
> 
> Niall O'Reilly
> Co-Chair, RIPE ENUM Working Group

Best regards,
Wilfried.

(1) Please see item Y., close to the bottom of
    http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/db-wg/2006/msg00217.html