[db-wg] Draft Minutes of the RIPE 52 DB-WG meeting
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Draft Minutes of the RIPE 52 DB-WG meeting
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Draft Minutes of the RIPE 52 DB-WG meeting
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Wed May 3 15:13:52 CEST 2006
On May 03, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:58:06PM +0200, Denis Walker wrote: > > If some people are concerned about having another object returned in a > > default query, there is a way round this. We could reverse the -c flag > > in the query. So the logic behind the -c flag returns an irt object. If > > -c is not used in an inet(6)num query, the server adds it. Then any irt > > object is returned by default in these queries. If -c is used in a > > query, on its own, the server takes it out. So by using -c you do not > > get the irt object. The benefit of this is that clueless users will get > > irt objects as a default. > This sounds very useful to me (and I think it reflects what was agreed > upon, in Manchester, IIRC). No, after Manchester the agreement was to return the irt record relevant to the queried ip/network. This is subtly different from the behaviour of -c, which may return a less specific inetnum object if the irt record is referenced by it. -- ciao, Marco -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20060503/cc14c243/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Draft Minutes of the RIPE 52 DB-WG meeting
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Draft Minutes of the RIPE 52 DB-WG meeting
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]