[dns-wg] Re: [db-wg] Proposal to change the syntax of "nserver:" attribute
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [db-wg] Proposal to change the syntax of "nserver:" attribute
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [db-wg] Proposal to change the syntax of "nserver:" attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Thu Jun 1 14:35:24 CEST 2006
Katie, to avoid any ambiguity in: Katie Petrusha wrote: > The IPv6 textual compressed form (Section 2.2.2, RFC 4291) is also > accepted (see examples) and will be converted into lowercase canonical > form. and to also cover: nserver: ns1.d1.example.com 2001:DB8:0:0:0:0:0:0 besides: > nserver: ns1.d1.example.com 2001:db8:0:0:0:0:0:0 I would like to see this paragraph rephrased to: The IPv6 notation can be case insensitive, the textual compressed form (Section 2.2.2, RFC 4291) is also accepted (see examples). [ipv6_address] will always be converted into lowercase canonical form. Best, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [db-wg] Proposal to change the syntax of "nserver:" attribute
- Next message (by thread): [dns-wg] Re: [db-wg] Proposal to change the syntax of "nserver:" attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]