AW: [db-wg] Adding route objects
- Previous message (by thread): AW: [db-wg] Adding route objects
- Next message (by thread): AW: [db-wg] Adding route objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Thu Apr 6 10:22:14 CEST 2006
On Apr 05, Winfried Haug <wh at germany.com> wrote: > > I would even argue that the WG should consider allowing whoever controls > > mnt-routes OR the referenced aut-num object to remove (not create) a > > route/route6 object even if the request is not authenticated by both > > maintainers. > this would not help in our case and i assume many ISPs might have the > same scenario. Yes, I understand this and I support your proposal. What I am proposing is an additional change to solve the second part of the problem (how to remove old route objects when the old ISP is not cooperating). -- ciao, Marco -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 191 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20060406/0233896d/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): AW: [db-wg] Adding route objects
- Next message (by thread): AW: [db-wg] Adding route objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]