[db-wg] irt object useless
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] irt object useless
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] irt object useless
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Fri May 27 22:05:34 CEST 2005
Hi, On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 07:51:31PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > As I don't see any more comments on this, have we already reached consensus? > Hiding more-specific objects by default is such a major change that I > do not think it can be deployed after a discussion among just three or > four people. Nobody wants to hide more-specifics. The goal is to show the inetnum: object (as before) and, in addition to that, the most-specific available irt: object. *In the default response*. So if the inetnum: has its own mnt-irt: then show it, but if there is only one for the encompassing /16 (or whatever), then show the "parent" irt: - otherweise irt: is pretty useless. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 71007 (66629) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 D- 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-234
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] irt object useless
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] irt object useless
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]