[db-wg] Whois changes

On 11 May 2005, at 00:28, James A. T. Rice wrote:

> Any chance of having changed: with a date (not an email address) back 
> in the default output?

On 13 May 2005, at 10:56, James A. T. Rice wrote:

> I'm curious to the arguements why this would be a bad thing.

If you're suggesting that the default method for displaying the 
'changed'
attribute should be something like

	changed:      (e-mail-not-revealed) 20030929

rather than

	changed:      hostmaster at ripe.net 20030929

I don't see any reason to "hope not", although this was actually my 
first
reaction too, just like Hendrik Voelker.  So, FMPOV, no "bad thing".

OTOH, since -B gives full detail, I'm wondering about the arguments in
favour of committing resources to its implementation.  Is it such an
outstandingly "good thing"?

/Niall