[db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Wed Feb 16 21:14:30 CET 2005
On 16 Feb 2005, at 17:39, Ulrich Kiermayr wrote: > In my opinion this aproach is wrong. an inetnum or route does not have > an email or even read emails. There is *someone* there handling abuse, > who has an email (maybe designated for abuse) that is reading malis > and hopefully doing something. What do I miss here. On 6 May 2004, at 11:39, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > Making the _same_ distinguished attribute available in both primary > (inet*num, AS) and secondary (reference-targets: person, role, org, > irt) objects > gives the widest scope for maintainers to do what is _convenient for > them_ whilst > retaining overall consistency. Best regards, Niall O'Reilly University College Dublin Computing Services PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net) Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]