[db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Sat Sep 11 03:45:11 CEST 2004
On Sep 10, Jeroen Massar <jeroen at unfix.org> wrote: > > Many of these options are not mutually exclusive, i.e. it's probably a > > good idea, independently from implementing or not abuse-c, to make PGP > > attributes in IRT records optional and to make the email address in the > > changed attribute a free form string (it does not /need/ to reference a > > person object, as long as people in each organization can agree on what > > should be put there). > > Is anybody opposed to these changes? > > Nope, changing the e-mail lines to person objects is probably wiser > indeed. The whois interface could btw hide all the entries between the > first and the last entry? Why? If you do not want them to appear in the public database you just have to edit your object. -- ciao, | Marco | [7938 alwj72cVVwVrA] -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20040911/10dd9a30/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]