[db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Fri Sep 10 19:40:15 CEST 2004
On Sep 10, MarcoH <marcoh at marcoh.net> wrote: > Summarizing the options: > > - implemnt a whole new object and change others to reference it > - minor database changes to limit the number of '@' signs returned > - use less generic attribute names (still need to work out that one, but > major change) > - change IRT to make PGP-stuff optional and thus IRT more usable > - do nothing and stop this now - return by default the less specific irt object for every inetnum/inetnum6 query, if one exists Many of these options are not mutually exclusive, i.e. it's probably a good idea, independently from implementing or not abuse-c, to make PGP attributes in IRT records optional and to make the email address in the changed attribute a free form string (it does not /need/ to reference a person object, as long as people in each organization can agree on what should be put there). Is anybody opposed to these changes? -- ciao, | Marco | [7931 in9oUGNDn6W1g]
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]