[db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco d'Itri
md at Linux.IT
Fri Sep 10 19:11:53 CEST 2004
On Sep 10, Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly at ucd.ie> wrote: > >everybody seems to be happy (or > >tired of it). > The second option, I would say! Agreed. I'm definitely not happy with a solution which requires modifying every inetnum record, and I still would like to know from the RIPE DB people if my proposal of returning IRT records by default on inetnum/inetnum6 queries could be considered. -- ciao, | Marco | [7930 aljXJfLaZqCQc]
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] draft agenda (V1) for DB-WG meeting, RIPE 49, Manchester, UK
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]