[db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ulrich Kiermayr
ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at
Sun May 9 13:29:40 CEST 2004
Hi *, > In your case there is no need to actually provide whois reassignments > because the ips are still in use at the university (ok by its students) > and it is the same with IPv4. Nor is there reason why large company would > provide reassignments on each /48 for each of their employers. Yes, but if you ar selling commercial services this is not always inuitively clear to me. so it at least needs smone definition. > If these end-users have large enough network that they need /48 on public > internet as does some large public company, then perhaps they should accept > responsibility that comes with it. well my point is, that 3 Computers might as well be 'large enough' to require a /48: (ripe-267, 5.4.1; rfc3177). I have no Problem taking responsibility. We just should descide to do this in a sensible way. lG uk -- Ulrich Kiermayr Zentraler Informatikdienst der Universitaet Wien Network - Security - ACOnet-CERT Universitaetsstrasse 7, 1010 Wien, AT eMail: ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at Tel: (+43 1) 4277 / 14104 PGP Key-ID: 0xA8D764D8 Fax: (+43 1) 4277 / 9140
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]