[db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ulrich Kiermayr
ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at
Sat May 8 13:13:52 CEST 2004
Hi, >> Not quite, surely. We want to provide one user population with >> exactly one e-mail address and not too much else; In an ideal world (tm). The database would contain e-mail addresses in objects that describe a person or a group of persons (because only they can actually read eMails). everywhere else (i.e. Notifications/changed,....) should contain a reference to that someone. Because: What you do is to notify/inform/write something to _someone_ having an email address, and not notifying a Mailbox. This in conjunction whith the comment thing from my last mail should actually make the 'normal' output understandable to anyone who reads [1]. But I know that this would Imply a _major_ change in the way the Database works, and therefore I suppose it is not realistic. But at least the comments migt help in that case. lG uk [1] Howver I know that the ability to read scales whith the Clue-Density defined in the Secret-WG, so all of this might not solve any of these issues ;-) -- Ulrich Kiermayr Zentraler Informatikdienst der Universitaet Wien Network - Security - ACOnet-CERT Universitaetsstrasse 7, 1010 Wien, AT eMail: ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at Tel: (+43 1) 4277 / 14104 PGP Key-ID: 0xA8D764D8 Fax: (+43 1) 4277 / 9140
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]