[db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ulrich Kiermayr
ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at
Thu May 6 15:32:23 CEST 2004
Niall O'Reilly wrote: > > On 6 May 2004, at 13:14, Ulrich Kiermayr wrote: > >> That is where the -c kicks in. and for a good solution, id prefer a >> shell -liner (similar to the one i presented in january) to update all >> these (at once). I think this is bearable for the NOCs that care. > > > Fine. That makes it less onerous, but why would I want to add > > abuse-c: NO8 > > to every object where I already have > > tech-c: NO8 > > ? > > I don't see the gain. But what if I want. abuse-c: UVABU1-RIPE everywhere where I have tech-c: UVNA1-RIPE because Abuse is handled by someone else that technical Issues on the Network. And I see gain here. where es you do not loose something if you like to achieve the first. Hmm (I think there are a lot of Inetnums out there where admin-c == tech-c at the moment; where is the gain in that?) lG uk -- Ulrich Kiermayr Zentraler Informatikdienst der Universitaet Wien Network - Security - ACOnet-CERT Universitaetsstrasse 7, 1010 Wien, AT eMail: ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at Tel: (+43 1) 4277 / 14104 PGP Key-ID: 0xA8D764D8 Fax: (+43 1) 4277 / 9140
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposal: Abuse-C as a Reference
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]