[db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Pim van Pelt
pim at bit.nl
Thu May 6 13:51:49 CEST 2004
Hi, Thanks for pointing this out. I was not familiar enough with the matter. Apparently Jeroen Massar is, as he headed the implementation of IRT in SixXS. I seem to have messed it up somewhat :-) | Hmm, this is nice, but not really necessary, because with the -c flag in | the whois-query you should get tho the allocated /40 anyway. | | i.e. your change should increase the # of objects, bur not the Footprint | of the IRT .. which was pointed out to me by other individuals as well. While we're on it (and I'm embarraed as it is), should I revert that software change and NOT set mnt-irt in the more specifics, or should I leave it as is. Opinions ? -- Met vriendelijke groet, BIT BV / Ing P.B. van Pelt PBVP1-RIPE (PGPKEY-4DCA7E5E)
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Abuse-C/IRT
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]