[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Patrick Rother
krd at gulu.net
Thu Jan 29 16:54:10 CET 2004
Hello. On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:48:48PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 29.01 12:42, Niall O'Reilly wrote: > > o The inetnum: and inet6num: objects are enhanced with an optional > > attribute "abuse-c:". The value of the attribute is a nic-handle: > > which must refer to an extant person: or role: object. There may be > > zero or more abuse-c: attributes in an inet*num: object. > > I don't see any reason why abuse-c: should refer to person: or role: > object. Because admin-c and tech-c are person or role objects, too, and not simple email addresses. Because person or role objects have phone and snailmail addresses. I strongly second the original proposal, please implement this asap! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/attachments/20040129/f906ac4e/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]