[db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at att.net.il
Thu Jan 29 13:59:50 CET 2004
At 12:56 PM 29-01-04 +0000, Randy Bush wrote: > >> o The inetnum: and inet6num: objects are enhanced with an optional > >> attribute "abuse-c:". The value of the attribute is a nic-handle: > >> which must refer to an extant person: or role: object. There may be > >> zero or more abuse-c: attributes in an inet*num: object. > > I don't see any reason why abuse-c: should refer to person: or role: > > object. Simple email address(es) would be imho just enough... > >i could live with that Ditto - makes no difference to me - whatever the consensus agrees on. -Hank >randy
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c: proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]