[db-wg] abuse-c
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
MarcoH
marcoh at marcoh.net
Tue Jan 13 17:29:23 CET 2004
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 05:11:18PM +0100, Sebastian Abt wrote: > > Im not sure why it should be multiple? But I think most of us on this > > list can agree with you that a valid abuse email address associated > > with each inetnum in the database would be very welcome. > > That's quite simple: I'd like to insert my customers abuse desk as well > as my own abuse desk to at least keep track of any incidents. So we end up with extending the inet(6)num template to include: abuse: [optional] [multiple] Extend mntner template with: abuse: [mandatory] [multiple] And possibly modify the database software to always list the abuse: field when not present on the inetnum resolve the mnt-by: and include the information in the inetnum response. The user will always find at least one abuse: line (or whatever we decide to call it) directly on the inet(6)num. The only thing we need then is to come up with a default on the mandatory field. I hereby suggest to copy them from the (mandatory) upd-to attributes. This will probably get people to update their mntner to include the correct information in short time. MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]