[db-wg] abuse-c
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
MarcoH
marcoh at marcoh.net
Mon Jan 12 16:26:23 CET 2004
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 03:48:40PM +0100, Christoph Mohr wrote: > > The problem with person object is that the email field is optional, so I > > don't see it as an option to refer to this object in abuse matters. > > It should be forbidden to put in a person/role without email address as a > tech-c or abuse-c. Or is there anybody out there who would to talk to a > technical person by snail mail :-) The last one "why is an email address not mandatory on person objects", has been raised before and from what I remember making this mandatory creates a race-condition in the initial setup when establishing a registry. (registry is needed for the email to work -> email is required working to create the registry). Grtx, MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]