[anti-spam-wg at ripe.net] Re: [db-wg] abuse-c

This would certainly address my needs.

Niall O'Reilly

On 12 Jan 2004, at 07:45, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:

> Realistically speaking it is not very likely that stupid tools will
> change very soon.  Nonetheless I like the proposal of a simple
> 'abuse-mailbox' attribute containing an e-mail address and nothing 
> else.
> This would open the possibility to ask tool-writers not to spam all the
> other e-mail addresses in the inet*num objects and any object remotely
> related to them.  In other words: we provide specific information where
> to send such messages, so it is a Bad Idea(TM) to send it anywhere
> else.


________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________