[db-wg] abuse-c
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
MarcoH
marcoh at marcoh.net
Mon Jan 12 14:50:48 CET 2004
On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 12:56:53PM +0100, Christian Rasmussen wrote: > Why not simply add "abuse-address" as a MANDATORY attribute in the > maintainer object, then Ripe NCC should have to check when creating a > maintainer object that the address is valid (eg. send a mail to the address, > Ripe NCC doesn't create the maintainer until their mail has been replied). > > It would be relatively simple for all LIRs to add such an attribute to their > maintainer object and then for Ripe NCC to check up on those objects missing > the attribute. The whois system would of course need to be modified to show > the abuse-address attribute when doing a whois, but I don't believe that > would be a big problem? I have some inetnum objects where I would like to get a seperate entry for the abuse address, thus allowing other people (the customer) to handle the 'frontline" abuse things or at least get copied on them. I think Daniel's proposal handles this nicely, use the abuse-address on the inetnum or where it fails the one on the maintainer object. I certainly don't want to create an extra maintainer the moment I want to delegate abuse handling to another partie or direct it to a seperate mailbox. Grtx, MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] abuse-c
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]