NCC#2003092385 [db-wg] uodate failure

• Previous message (by thread): NCC#2003092385 [db-wg] uodate failure
• Next message (by thread): NCC#2003092385 [db-wg] uodate failure

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Niall O'Reilly Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Tue Sep 9 10:50:52 CEST 2003

On Monday, Sep 8, 2003, at 18:57 Europe/Dublin, Randy Bush wrote:

> do you send the diagnostic output back to a compiler?

If you call auto-dbm a compiler! 8-)

One could use "###" instead of "***", and "#" instead of a blank
line to protect against the kind of failure mode Wilfried suggests.

Do ppl really correct (sic) and re-submit failure responses so
carelessly?

Seriously, though: it seems the developers have the "diagnostic
message" issue taken well on board.  The only detail I'm not too
clear about is the timescale.

Best,

Niall

• Previous message (by thread): NCC#2003092385 [db-wg] uodate failure
• Next message (by thread): NCC#2003092385 [db-wg] uodate failure

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]