[db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ulrich Kiermayr
ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at
Thu Sep 4 15:09:18 CEST 2003
Hi Denis, > [snip] > > It may be a bit of an overkill to add mnt-ref: to the mntner: as in > most cases people would probably make it refer to itself, although it > would be consistent. Another option to prevent un-authorised use > (malicious or accidental) of a mntner is to require the mntner's own > authorisation to be provided whenever it is added to an object. I agree, that it looks like an overkill, but I'd prefer to see a consistent behaviour among all the objects. [I cold also imagine cases, where they might as well differ]. On the other hand i could also imagine a fallback-scheme like in the mnt-lower: if no mnt-ref, them use the mntner itself or so.... One thing i have not checked: Is a ref-nfy in a mntner redundant informaiton (e.g already coverd by notify there)? lG uk -- Ulrich Kiermayr Zentraler Informatikdienst der Universitaet Wien Network/Security Universitaetsstrasse 7, 1010 Wien, Austria eMail: ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at Tel: (+43 1) 4277 / 14104 Fax: (+43 1) 4277 / 9140
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]