[db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal for modification of irt object schema [was "Re: The New "organisation object" Proposal"]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ulrich Kiermayr
ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at
Thu Sep 4 09:54:33 CEST 2003
Shane Kerr wrote: > On 2003-09-04 09:22:56 +0200, Ulrich Kiermayr wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>One thing (too early to think about all at once) >> >> >>>If we agree on this more generic solution, we could extend this >>>behavior to other Objects that can be referenced as well. >>>e.g. for mntner: itself. this would be a way tho prevent anyone >> >>>from putting my mntner ont oan object. (This would solve the issue >> >>>discussed in the context of the IRT Object - where the mntner of >>>the object should be a proof of authenticity as well) >> >>This idea is good by means of consistency, BUT it would be weaker >>than the auth: in the IRT, because there are only PGP keys allowed, >>whereas in a mntner anything is possible. > > > Actually, you can use any "auth:" type in the IRT (even NONE!!!). But > don't do that. :-/ `,:-] hmm interesting, well then, it mnt-ref and auth are of the same quality in irt as well. lG uk, who slowly starts to wake up :-) -- Ulrich Kiermayr Zentraler Informatikdienst der Universitaet Wien Network/Security Universitaetsstrasse 7, 1010 Wien, Austria eMail: ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at Tel: (+43 1) 4277 / 14104 Fax: (+43 1) 4277 / 9140
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] proposal for modification of irt object schema [was "Re: The New "organisation object" Proposal"]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]