[db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ulrich Kiermayr
ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at
Thu Sep 4 09:22:56 CEST 2003
Hi, One thing (too early to think about all at once) > If we agree on this more generic solution, we could extend this behavior > to other Objects that can be referenced as well. > e.g. for mntner: itself. this would be a way tho prevent anyone from > putting my mntner ont oan object. (This would solve the issue discussed > in the context of the IRT Object - where the mntner of the object should > be a proof of authenticity as well) This idea is good by means of consistency, BUT it would be weaker than the auth: in the IRT, because there are only PGP keys allowed, whereas in a mntner anything is possible. lG uk -- Ulrich Kiermayr Zentraler Informatikdienst der Universitaet Wien Network/Security Universitaetsstrasse 7, 1010 Wien, Austria eMail: ulrich.kiermayr at univie.ac.at Tel: (+43 1) 4277 / 14104 Fax: (+43 1) 4277 / 9140
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] The New "organisation object" Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]