[db-wg] Should the "e-mail" attribute be mandatory for the "person" object?
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Should the "e-mail" attribute be mandatory for the "person" object?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Should the "e-mail" attribute be mandatory for the "person" object?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
der Mouse
mouse at Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA
Fri Nov 7 19:02:40 CET 2003
>> But I strongly believe that every inetnum _needs_ an email address, >> one which reaches a human with authority to deal with abuse issues >> relating to that netblock. > Please be aware that there is an object that is available for > documenting Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT). This > is the irt object, [...] Well, I-the-abuse-victim (usually but not necessarily spam recipient) don't much care whether it's done with an irt object or with a person object, as long as I can locate somewhere useful to write to. :-) > It is not currently a requirement to have a way to deal with abuse > issues to be allocated or assigned IP space in the RIPE NCC service > region. That needs to be fixed, then. (Actually, I believe that the RIPE should have all its address space taken away from it by the IANA until it gets fixed; nobody should have address space without being contactable about abuse issues. And yes, I recognize that this isn't going to happen.) /~\ The ASCII der Mouse \ / Ribbon Campaign X Against HTML mouse at rodents.montreal.qc.ca / \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Should the "e-mail" attribute be mandatory for the "person" object?
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Should the "e-mail" attribute be mandatory for the "person" object?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]