[db-wg] Proposed change 2003.1: notification for more-specific
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed change 2003.1: notification for more-specific
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed change 2003.1: notification for more-specific
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim McGinnis
mctim at ripe.net
Mon Mar 10 16:26:37 CET 2003
O > > p.s. I also think that "upd-to:" and "mnt-nfy:" are probably not the > best names. But what can we expect of a standard with things > like "mntner:" and "aggr-mtd:"? (These names can't be to > shorten them, or we wouldn't have "peering-set:" and > "mbrs-by-ref:")? Would it make sense to make an alias for > "upd-to:" of something reasonable, e.g. "auth-fail-nfy:"? > You beauty!! and one for the other "mnt-nfy", something reasonable, e.g. "hey-your-update-worked" -- McTim
- Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed change 2003.1: notification for more-specific
- Next message (by thread): [db-wg] Proposed change 2003.1: notification for more-specific
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]