[db-wg] New "status" tag of REVOKED requested

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] New "status" tag of REVOKED requested
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] X-NCC-RegID : cm.intelcam deleting objects

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Aleksi Suhonen ripe-ml-2003 at ssd.axu.tm
Wed Jun 25 01:47:23 CEST 2003

Hello,

Quote from Hank Nussbacher:
} >I think 90-120 days is too little before removing the inetnum object.  I
} >also think that a better a tactic would be to add a "remarks" to the
} >inetnum or perhaps create a new "status" tag such as REVOKED.  I also think
} >such a policy should be uniform between RIRs.

} >Comments?

Status: REVOKED sounds like the most sensible thing to do. I don't
believe in lengthening the period before reallocation, but some sort of
a more proactive revocation procedure might get the address space back
into production faster and the new status value could be part of that.

--
	Aleksi Suhonen / Axu TM Oy
	Internetworking Consulting

• Previous message (by thread): [db-wg] New "status" tag of REVOKED requested
• Next message (by thread): [db-wg] X-NCC-RegID : cm.intelcam deleting objects

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ db-wg Archives ]