[apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Wed Jun 12 14:54:41 CEST 2002
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 13:00, Robert Kiessling wrote: > Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net> writes: > > > This is an excellent idea. However I would use > > ALLOCATED_TO_LIR and ASSIGNED_TO_END_USER. > > That way we clarify the subtle difference while > > maintaining consistency with existing documentation. > > This is still missing a status for allocations done by LIRs to someone Don't you mean assignments? :-) > who is neither LIR nor end user ("NLA"). Examples? (I'm probably just being stupid)
- Previous message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
- Next message (by thread): [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ db-wg Archives ]