Proposal for adding external repository reference to import/expor t attributes
Mark Prior mrp at mrp.net
Sat Aug 24 14:08:19 CEST 2002
At 3:10 PM -0400 23/8/02, Curtis Villamizar wrote: >It is possible to reactivate a WG on the mailing list only, for the >purpose of updating an existing RFC and not having a meeting. This >was done with TCPLW for RFC1323. Cengiz would need to update RPSL (as >primary author and keeper of the source of that document). > >Is the only change needed at this point the :: notation to indicate >external repository? If so, no change is needed to RFC-2622 since the >:: notation is called for in RFC-2725 and it wouldn't be worth >updating RFC-2622 just for that. > >What you really need to do is get Larry Blunk to update the ISI tools. Curtis, I wasn't the person suggesting making changes, I was just suggesting that you needed to follow a procedure in order to make it happen and couldn't just "fix" it in software. I would suggest if people think this is a good idea (and I haven't really thought about it) then perhaps merging it into the RPSLng work would be the way to go. Mark.
[ db-wg Archives ]