Proposal for adding external repository reference to import/expor t attributes

At 3:10 PM -0400 23/8/02, Curtis Villamizar wrote:
>It is possible to reactivate a WG on the mailing list only, for the
>purpose of updating an existing RFC and not having a meeting.  This
>was done with TCPLW for RFC1323.  Cengiz would need to update RPSL (as
>primary author and keeper of the source of that document).
>
>Is the only change needed at this point the :: notation to indicate
>external repository?  If so, no change is needed to RFC-2622 since the
>:: notation is called for in RFC-2725 and it wouldn't be worth
>updating RFC-2622 just for that.
>
>What you really need to do is get Larry Blunk to update the ISI tools.

Curtis,

I wasn't the person suggesting making changes, I was just suggesting 
that you needed to follow a procedure in order to make it happen and 
couldn't just "fix" it in software. I would suggest if people think 
this is a good idea (and I haven't really thought about it) then 
perhaps merging it into the RPSLng work would be the way to go.

Mark.