AW: DB V3 feature request

On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Andres Petralli wrote:

AP> > a.b.c.d/xx
AP> > a.b.c.d 255.255.255.X
AP> > a.b.c.d - w.x.y.z
AP> > 
AP> > I do not care if the object created always contains:
AP> > 
AP> > a.b.c.d - w.x.y.z
AP> > 
AP> 
AP> Absolutely! It makes no sense that ripe changed to this dashed-only
AP> notation. I would also very much appreciate if at least the slashed
AP> notation would be re-introduced. This kind of notation is much more
AP> common than the other one!

AFAICC main problem with converting is that it should take place after
PGP/GPG signature checks, but before validating and querying inetnum
object from the DB...

Engin, am I right? ;-)

Sincerely,
D.Marck                                   [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck at rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------