sub-allocations or something similar

On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Joao Luis Silva Damas wrote:

JLSD> we are indeed working in implementing the LIR-ALLOCATED proposal.

Sounds great ;-) Are there any online resources with specifications or
something about?

JLSD> Having said that, I am not quite sure what Dmitry was looking for was
JLSD> this because he is trying to express aggregation (which ought to be
JLSD> expressed by a route object) and not re-allocation. Right now LIR
JLSD> allocations are already covered by the inetnum object with the
JLSD> ALLOCATED PA status.

Not fully; as I said before, this exact case involves sub-provider without
his own address space, so re-allocation would be rather flexible and
appropriate solution, AFAIK....

JLSD> Regards,
JLSD> Joao

Thanks, Joao, for your attention. Have a nice weekend ;-)


Sincerely,
D.Marck                                   [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck at rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------