sub-allocations or something similar

Hi,

isn't that already on the way, called LIR-ALLOCATED? A proposal by James
Aldrige...

But I don't have any clue about the current status.

Cheers,

	Carsten

Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> 
> Hello there colleagues,
> 
> for some last years I'm working with RIPE DB I think it would be useful to
> have some kind of "sub-allocation" inetnum objects. Brief example in our
> current situation:
> 
> there is downstream provider behind us, currently without its own address
> block, so I've assigned /21 for them. All that space was of course
> well-documented, with ripe-141's covering all the nets, and appropriate
> inetnum objects have been created. But, for aggregating purposes, I
> suppose aggregating inetnum for the whole /21 would be useful and
> self-documenting. I can create such object, but such object is considered
> as overlapped.
> 
> I think about explicit route-object also, but size behind current minimum
> allocation size (/19 for 195/8 or /20 for newer) somewhat stops me :)
> 
> Your (both community and especially RIPE NCC people) suggestions are
> strongly expected ;-) Thank you.
> 
> Sincerely,
> D.Marck                                   [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck at rinet.ru ***
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------