Privacy, Broadband, & the Database

On Wed, 29 Nov 2000, Jan-Pieter Cornet wrote:

[skip]

JC> >   It depends on the level of "responsibility" and functionality granted to
JC> >   and exercised by that end site. As I've said in a private mail already,
JC> >   we should ask the question about the usefulness of "assigning" (in the
JC> >   good old sense) very small amounts of addresses to sites which are tied
JC> >   in to the services of their provider anyway. I guess most of the ADSL,
JC> >   dial-up, cable-TV connection assignments sh/could be reviewed from that
JC> >   point of view.

Moreover, I think that if (and only if) ISP is ready to be responsible to
its customer network toubleshooting (and I think many, if not most of them
actually are ready), AND real network holder is private person, then ISP
person MAY be used as network admin-c, possibly with approprate comments:
fields. Using Customer's name and ISP's address/phones in one object is
not appropriate, as for me...


Sincerely,
D.Marck                                   [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck at rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------